The MD family of hashing algorithms were designed by Ron Rivest during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. MD actually stands for “Message Digest”.
It was optimized to run on 8-bit computers and generates a 128-bit hash value the hashes are generally displayed as hexadecimal string which is 32 characters long. This hash exhibits features of the avalanche effect, and so even a very small change in the text string will result in a very different hexadecimal string being created.
It was developed by Ronald Rivest in 1990. The digest length is 128 bits. The algorithm has influenced later designs, such as the MD5, SHA-1 and RIPEMD algorithms. The first full collision attack against MD4 was published in 1995 and several newer attacks have been published since then and it has been severely compromised.
It was developed in 1991 and it replaced the earlier hash function MD4 due to believed weaknesses in this algorithm. 1996 was a very damaging year to MD5 however, a flaw was discovered in its design. The size of the hash is 128 bits, and so is small enough to allow a birthday attack. Once considered really safe, now completely broken.
The SHA series of algorithms stand for “Secure Hash Algorithm” they were developed by NIST. Due to the avalanche effect even a small change in the data to be encrypted will probably result in a very different hash string. Because the SHA algorithms show signs of the avalanche effect they are believed to have quite a good randomization feature. SHA algorithms were based upon the MD4&5 algorithms developed by Ron Rivest. SHA was released by the national security authority as a US government standard.
It was published in 1993 and officially known as SHA, it was the first incarnation of the secure hashing algorithm. This first version was withdrawn soon after release due to weaknesses in the design. SHA-1 was released a couple of years later that fixed these problems.
It was published in 1994 and developed by NIST, it has been compromised in 2005, but its real “death” occurred in 2010, Xiaoyun Wang managed to break the popular hashes, which is now unsafe. SHA-1 is similar to MD4 and MD5 hashing algorithms, and due to the fact that it is slightly more secure than MD4 & MD5 it is considered as MD5’s successor, but it’s also slower than MD5. It produces a 160-bit (20-byte) hash value. It’s typically rendered as a 40 digits long hexadecimal number.
It shares the same structure and mathematical operations as its predecessor (SHA-1)someday maybe will be unsafe also. Its family has six hash functions with digests as below.
- SHA256 (32-byte words)
- SHA512 (64-byte words)
A hash function formerly called Keccak, chosen in 2012 after a public competition among non-NSA designers. It supports the same hash lengths as SHA-2, and its internal structure differs significantly from the rest of the SHA family.
HAVAL is another popular hash function, it differs from many other hash functions because it is possible for it to generate hash values in different lengths, the lengths of the hashes can be 128 bits, 160 bits, 192 bits, 224 bits or 245 bits. HAVAL was designed in 1992. This hashing function exhibits the avalanche effect and so even a small change in the string is likely to result in a very different hash value. Recent research, mostly by Xiaoyun Wang has indicated that HAVAL has a number of weaknesses, perhaps putting the use of it on hold.
RIPEMD was developed by a European consortium, and was designed as an extension of the original RIPEMD hash function.
Whirlpool is a cryptographic hash function designed by Vincent Rijmen and Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, who first described it in 2000. Whirlpool is based on a substantially modified version of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Whirlpool produces a hash digest of 512 bits (64 bytes).